Jack County Farm Bureau v. Mote
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DICKENSON, Justice.
The controlling question is whether a constitutional county court had jurisdiction to decide a third party action which sought judgment over on a claim for the principal sum of $770.44 plus prejudgment interest and which also sought attorney fees of $500. We hold that the constitutional county court did not have jurisdiction.
*749United States Leasing Corporation sued Charles H. Mote to recover an indebtedness under a lease agreement for a copying machine, seeking the principal sum of $770.44 plus $223.42 as prejudgment interest. Charles H. Mote filed a third party action…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gimbel & Son v. J. Gomprecht & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
- Campsey v. BrumleyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- BAKERY EQUIP. & SERVICE CO., INC. v. Aztec Equip. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Williamson v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953