Legal Opinion

Jack County Farm Bureau v. Mote

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 13, 1979No. 5381Published

1Opinion of the Court

DICKENSON, Justice.

The controlling question is whether a constitutional county court had jurisdiction to decide a third party action which sought judgment over on a claim for the principal sum of $770.44 plus prejudgment interest and which also sought attorney fees of $500. We hold that the constitutional county court did not have jurisdiction.

*749United States Leasing Corporation sued Charles H. Mote to recover an indebtedness under a lease agreement for a copying machine, seeking the principal sum of $770.44 plus $223.42 as prejudgment interest. Charles H. Mote filed a third party action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gimbel & Son v. J. Gomprecht & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Campsey v. BrumleyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. BAKERY EQUIP. & SERVICE CO., INC. v. Aztec Equip. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Williamson v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API