Legal Opinion
Haas v. Gill
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided October 7, 1988No. 88-CC-1669Published
1Dissent 1
ON APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY WRITS
2Dissent · ColeCole, Justice
Because I disagree with both the majority’s result and its method of disposing of the plaintiff’s claim, I respectfully dissent.
This is a defamation action which comes before the Court on the defendants’ application for supervisory writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus to review the Court of Appeal’s denial of their motion for summary judgment. On remand from this Court,1 the Court of Appeal, by Kliebert, J., unanimously affirmed the trial court’s denial of summary judgment and ordered the case to proceed to trial. Haas v. Gill, 527 So.2d 368…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. BreslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mashburn v. CollinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Emp. Surplus Line Ins. v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Andrew Dev. Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Schaefer v. LynchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.