Legal Opinion

Spettigue v. Arizona Highway Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 15, 1971No. 2 CA-CIV 858PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

On February 17, 1967, plaintiffs instituted a personal injury action against the State of Arizona and the Arizona State Highway Commission, hereinafter referred to as the appellees. Plaintiffs asserted that the negligent design, maintenance and marking of the Queen Creek Bridge proximately resulted in an automobile accident in which the plaintiff, Richard A. Spet*335tigue, was injured. Thereafter, the plaintiffs filed a motion for partial summary judgment as to liability. The motion for summary judgment was based upon the fact that plaintiff’s injuries arose out of the same two-car…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spettigue v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Adamson v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. State v. StoneArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Maricopa County Medical Society v. BlendeArizona Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Steed v. CuevasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API