Croskey v. Wallace
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 66, Oct. T., 1902, by plaintiff, from order of O. P. No. 3, Phila Co., March T., 1902, No. 490, making absolute rule to dismiss appeal in case of John Welsh Croskey v. Robert Wallace. Appeal from justice of the peace. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was the order of the court. cited: Jennings v. Rundall, 8 T. R. 335; Murphy v. Thall, 17 Pa.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 66, Oct. T., 1902, by plaintiff, from order of O. P. No. 3, Phila Co., March T., 1902, No. 490, making absolute rule to dismiss appeal in case of John Welsh Croskey v. Robert Wallace. Appeal from justice of the peace. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was the order of the court. cited: Jennings v. Rundall, 8 T. R. 335; Murphy v. Thall, 17 Pa. Superior Ct. 500. cited: Zell v. Arnold, 2 P. & W. 292; Henion v. Morton, 2 Ash. 150; McCahan v. Hirst, 7 Watts, 175; Todd v. Figley, 7 Watts, 542; Green v. Patterson, 3 Pa. Superior Ct. 354; Hunt v.…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
W. D- Porter, J.,
This action came into the court below upon an appeal by the defendant from the judgment of a magistrate. The plaintiff filed a statement averring in substance that he had entered into a contract with the defendant for the cleaning of a carpet and *113that the defendant had undertaken to clean the carpet without causing it to shrink; that the defendant had cleaned and dried the carpet so negligently as to cause it to shrink and that the carpet was by such negligence damaged to the amount of 175.00. The court upon motion of the defendant granted a rule on the plaintiff to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Murphy v. ThallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901