Legal Opinion · Dissent

McClain v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1997No. 93A02-9602-EX-72Published

1DissentBarteau, Judge

In order to make a prima facie showing of just cause for termination of McClain’s employment, IUPUI had to establish that McClain: (1) knowingly violated; (2) a reasonable; and (3) uniformly enforced rule. Hehr v. Review Bd. of Ind. Emp. Sec. Div., 534 N.E.2d 1122, 1124 (Ind.Ct.App.1989). The majority determines that IUPUI failed to establish that its rule regarding falsification of time cards was uniformly enforced. I disagree.

Whether IUPUI’s policy was uniformly enforced was a question of fact and the Board’s decision regarding all questions of fact is conclusive if supported by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hehr v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Russell v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Kuntz v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Butler v. REVIEW BD. OF IND. DEPT. OF EMP. & TRAINING SERV.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. VanCleave v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API