Monumental Task Committee, Inc. v. Foxx

ORDER & REASONS

SECTION: “J”(3)

CARL J. BARBIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are several motions. First, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Continue1 and a supplemental memorandum in support thereof.2 Federal Defendants3 and the City4 filed oppositions thereto. Second, the City filed a Motion for Summary Judgment,5 and Plaintiffs filed an opposition6 thereto. Third, Federal Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Summary Judgment,7 and Plaintiffs filed an opposition8 thereto. Finally, the New Or*497leans Regional Transit Authority (“RTA”) filed a…