Legal Opinion
Sadler v. Jester
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided September 22, 1942No. 740PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
A motion to dismiss being presented, and the facts being unsettled, action thereon was deferred and the entire case submitted.
As thus exposed, I find that the plaintiff was a duly elected Railroad Commissioner for a term of six years which be*739gun in 1938. In May, 1942, he conferred with the Governor about resigning and advised that official that he would like to have a Mr. Kilday appointed in his stead. This, the Governor agreed to do. The Governor had in mind that such appointment would be for the filling of the office until the political party whose primary was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago v. Fieldcrest Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Edwards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Haine v. GoogeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Sawyer v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2003
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1996
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.