Legal Opinion
Pio v. GENERAL NUTRITION COMPANIES, INC.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 2, 2007No. 06 C 2140PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORAN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed class action claims against defendant in state court. Defendant later removed the case to this district court, invoking jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 1452(a), claiming relatedness to the bankruptcy proceeding of a manufacturer of nutritional supplements. Defendant then moved to transfer to the Southern District of New York, and plaintiffs moved to remand back to state court. On October 31, 2006, plaintiffs’ motion to remand was granted, and defendant’s motion to transfer was denied as moot. 1 On November 10,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In re United States Brass Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MOTI Partners, LLC v. Desert Palace, Inc. (In Re Caesars Entm't Operating Co.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Taylor v. ZampellaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024