Legal Opinion
Masters v. Traders National Bank
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.
A motion to remove a cause from the State courts to the Federal courts is not a pro forma application but one which rests in the sound judgment of the court. (Burlington, etc., R. Co. v. Dunn, 122 U. S. 513, 516; Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. v. McCabe, 213 id. 207, 218; Iowa Central R. Co. v. Bacon, 236 id. 305.) The motion is to be determined by reference to the material statements of fact contained in the complaint. (Tennessee v. Union & Planters’ Bank, 152 U. S. 454; Oregon Short Line, etc., Co. v. Skottowe, 162 id. 490; Hanford v. Davies, 163 id. 273; Walker v. Collins, 167 id. 57; Third St.,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Taylor v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Gold-Washing and Water Co. v. KeyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Plunkett v. BainCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932