Legal Opinion

Lamar v. Johnson

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1919No. 2 Div. 179PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dallas County; B. M. Miller, Judge. Action by Ernest Lamar against J. H. Johnson. From the judgment rendered, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.

This is an action by the appellant against the appellee to recover the proceeds of three bales of cotton raised by one Golson on a farm near Burnsville in Dallas county, known as the Palmer tract. The trial was by the court without the intervention of a jury, and without regard to the special pleadings in the case, the record containing the following statement:

“Both parties consented in open court that trial by jury be waived, and that the complaint be considered as amended to state a cause of action, and that said cause be tried on a plea of the general issue by consent in short for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Welsh v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  3. Comer v. SheehanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Alabama National Bank v. Mary Lee Coal & Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Karter v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Hughes & Tidwell Supply Co. v. CarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Buchmann v. CallahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Leeth Nat. Bank v. ElrodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API