Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Waynesboro Knitting Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 16, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
This motion is in all respects denied.
I. This suit is brought by the assignee of Eday Fabrics; Inc., a corporation of New Jersey, against the Waynesboro Knitting *694Company, a corporation of Pennsylvania. The amount involved is in excess of the statutory requirement of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and this court, therefore, has subject-matter jurisdiction of the ease on the ground of diversity of citizenship between the parties, and, ajS to the venue in this district, the defendant by removing the ease has waived any question thereof.
II. This motion is not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Crane v. C. Crane & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
- Dexter & Carpenter, Inc. v. Lake & Export Coal Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Grimwood v. Munson S. S. LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Universal Transp. Co. v. Rederiaktiebolaget AmieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Emmons v. IngebretsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1968
- Heitzmann v. Willys-Overland Motors, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1946
- Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Robinson v. MaddenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022