Legal Opinion
Lupfer v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided May 15, 1922No. Claim No. 14649PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Claim for breach of contract.
1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.
The claimants, as contractors, constructed locks 2 and 7 of the improved Oswego canal and equipped them with power plants and other machinery. They have alleged and established that various acts of the state’s engineers were in breach of the contract and resulted in extra work and loss. We find their damages to be $1,354.70. It is unnecessary to discuss the reasons which bring us to these conclusions. The state challenges our jurisdiction on the ground that notice of intention was not filed within six months from the time the claim accrued. It was filed June 26, 1916. All the breaches of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buckles v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Smith v. . RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Adams v. . OlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- People Ex Rel. Grannis v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- O'Neil v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edlux Construction Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- T. Y. Leonard, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1933