Legal Opinion

Fore v. Hitson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1888No. 5721PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from. Tarrant. Tried below before the Hon. R. E. Beckham.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Associate Justice.

It appears that early in 1883, Fore, Morphy & Henderson were partners in a contract to deliver cattle to the Stone Cattle and Pasture Company. The ■cattle purchased for the contract were thrown back upon them, ■and were sold to The Texas Investment Company in July, 1883. *518From that time until the date of the bond sued on, May 27, 1884, the parties had transaction together in winding up their old matters. They had debts to settle and had paper of The Texas Investment Company to use to meet and settle their debts.

In July, 1884, an organization of The Texas Investment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Powell v. MesserTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. New-York Firemen Insurance Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dowdy v. Southern Traction Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. Pettithory v. Clarke CourtsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Rutlin v. Trinity Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Lewin v. BarryColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Munday Trading Co. v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API