Legal Opinion

Berlin v. Eimer & Amend

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 1945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

Plaintiff sued for overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and reasonable attorney’s fee under the Pair Labor Standards Act of 1938. (52 U. S. Stat. 1060; U. S. Code, tit. 29, §§ 201-219.), The defense was that plaintiff was employed in a bona fide executive, professional or administrative capacity and therefore was excluded from the benefits of the act. After *304trial without a jury at Trial Term, the court held in accordance with defendant’s contention that plaintiff was an exempt employee under the act and directed judgment in defendant’s favor dismissing the complaint on the merits.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sun Pub. Co. v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  2. George Lawley & Son Corp. v. SouthCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
  3. Fanelli v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. Leonard v. S. G. Frantz Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  5. Clark v. Standard Rock Asphalt Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tenalp Construction Corp. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API