Enright v. Beaumond
Supreme Court of Vermont
Assumpsit. Trial by court at the April term, 1894, Chittenden county, Rowell, J., presiding. Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepts. The judgment in the trustee process protects the defendant. Holmes v. Clark and Hubbard, 46 Vt. 22 ; Farmer’s and Mechanic's Bank v. Drury, 35 Vt. 469; Barron v. Porter, 44 Vt. 587.
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
The note for which the court below gave judgment was the last of a series of six made payable to the order of the George G. McLaughlin Manufacturing Company, under which name one George G. McLaughlin carried on business. The plaintiff in interest is one Hezekiah McLaughlin, who is found to have become the owner of the last four notes of the series by virtue of a sale, endorsement and delivery thereof made in good faith prior to their maturity. It appears, however, that the George G. McLaughlin Manufacturing Company continued to deal with the defendant after this transfer as if it were still…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Marsh v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
- Seward v. HeflinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
3Cited by5 opinions
- First Wisconsin Mortgage Trust v. Wyman's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Woodward v. LaporteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898
- Baldwin v. PercivalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
- Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
- Otis v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923