Legal Opinion

Fredrick Deone Gooden v. Brett C. Klumpp, Charles Horsley, Robert D. Stivers, and T.D.C.J.- CID

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided January 29, 2015No. 02-14-00186-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-14-00186-CV FREDRICK DEONE GOODEN APPELLANT V. BRETT C. KLUMPP, CHARLES APPELLEES HORSLEY, ROBERT D. STIVERS, AND T.D.C.J.-CID ---------- FROM THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 179,717-B ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 ---------- In nine issues, appellant Fredrick Deone Gooden, a pro se inmate, appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his lawsuit for failure to comply with procedural requirements in chapter 14 of the civil practice and remedies code. See Tex. 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bell v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice—Institutional Division, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  2. Hamilton v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  3. Thomas v. Wichita General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Bishop v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Amir-Sharif v. Mason, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API