Legal Opinion

Kawalis v. Kawalis

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

The defendant challenges the legal sufficiency of plaintiff’s complaint.

According to the complaint, the parties since on or about July 28, 1933, have been and are tenants by the entirety of certain improved real property; that between January 1, 1942, and up to the date of the complaint the defendant has been in possession and control of the ground floor of the premises and has committed the following acts of waste: (a) neglect to take care of the pipes with the result that they became broken and burst, thereby depriving the entire building of running hot and cold water; (b) willful neglect…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Kujek v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Finnegan v. HumesNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Medina v. MedinaNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Burrofato v. CretellaNew York Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API