Legal Opinion

In re the Protest of Heacock

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application to review the decision of the secretary of state in determining that James S. Sherman was entitled to have his name printed upon the official ballot as the regular Republican nominee' from the- twenty-fifth congressional district in this state, and that Seth Gr. Heacock was not so entitled.

1Opinion of the CourtHerrick, J.

This is an application to review the decision of the secretary of state in determining that James S. Sherman is entitled to have his name printed upon the official ballot as the regular Republican nominee from the twenty-fifth congressional district in this state, and that Seth G. Heacock is not so entitled.

I find, as a conclusion of fact, that the so-called Sherman delegates were regularly chosen at the assembly district- convention held for that purpose in the third assembly district of Oneida county. ' This being true, Mr. Sherman had a majority of the regularly elected delegates at the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re SweeneyNew York Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API