Legal Opinion

Horsley v. Philadelphia Board of Pensions & Retirement

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 17, 1988No. 73 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1987PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDermott, justice.

Appellant appeals from the Commonwealth Court’s affirmance of the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. That order upheld the decision of the Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement, which suspended the retirement benefits of her husband, Benjamin Horsley, Jr., pursuant to Section 217 of the Municipal Retirement System Ordinance 1 of the City of Philadelphia.

The underlying facts of this controversy are not in dispute.

Appellant’s husband was employed in various positions with the Philadelphia Department of Licenses and Inspections for nearly…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Thorp, Reed & ArmstrongCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Bellomini v. State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Horsley v. Philadelphia Board of Pensions & RetirementCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Woods v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Fairview Township v. Fairview Township Police Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Merlino v. Philadelphia Board of Pensions & RetirementCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Hames v. City of MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
  5. Baillie v. Public School Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API