Legal Opinion

Tullos v. Eaton Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 7, 1985No. 09-83-240 CVPublished

1Opinion

DISSENT ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

BURGESS, Justice.

I respectfully dissent. The majority has a disdain for the manner in which the jurisdiction question was presented to this court. In that, I agree. I must, however, dissent to the majority’s holding that the question of jurisdiction may not be advanced in the appellee’s motion for rehearing since it was not raised in his brief. As a general rule the majority is correct. The question of jurisdiction is an exception, if not the exception. The jurisdiction of this court may be raised and decided at any stage of the proceedings. St. Louis

Our court,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morrison by Morrison v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  2. Boyd v. Raymondville State Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  3. Grubbs v. Mercantile Texas Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1984
  4. Voss International, Inc. v. General Portland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Wells v. Metro Fina Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API