Legal Opinion

Roseborough v. Scott

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 22, 1994No. 80737PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANSEN, Judge:

Appellant Gary Roseborough (Rosebor-ough) seeks review of a trial court order dismissing his Petition claiming denial of his constitutional right, under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, to practice religion.

Roseborough, an inmate at the Jackie Brannon Correctional Center (JBCC), filed his Petition 1 initiating this action under the authority of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 2 . He named Appellee Sonny Scott (Scott) defendant, alleging Scott, as JBCC Warden, violated his constitutional right of freedom of religion by denying Roseborough’s request for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Martinez v. AaronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  5. Stuckey v. Young Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Louk v. CormierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Hoerman v. Western Heights Board of EducationCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Lay v. McElvenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Louk v. CormierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API