Legal Opinion

In re Casey

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 15, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAFFEY, District Judge.

I. Filing of a claim is prohibited after the elaspe of more than six months after the first date set for the first meeting of creditors (Bankr.Act, § 57, sub. n, 11 U.S.C.A. § 93, sub. n). If, however, a proof of claim has been filed within the prescribed period but it be defective, e. g., through failure to comply with the requirements of section 57, sub. n of the Bankruptcy Act or of General Order No. 21,11 U. S.C.A. following, section 53, by amendment, permitted by the court, that same claim, revised to conform with those requirements, may be filed subsequent to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. OtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. In Re LipmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  3. In Re BrillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  4. In Re PrindibleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  5. Ebeling v. BobengCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Phoenix Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. In Re Marine Maintenance Corporation (Four Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Phoenix Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API