Legal Opinion
Reiswerg v. Statom
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 2010No. 49S02-0906-CV-280Published
1Opinion of the Court
926 N.E.2d 26 (2010)
Joseph J. REISWERG and Cohen Garelick & Glazier, Appellants (Defendants below),
v.
Pam STATOM, Appellee (Plaintiff below).
No. 49S02-0906-CV-280.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
May 6, 2010.
David T. Kasper, Julia Blackwell Gelinas, Maggie L. Smith, Lucy R. Dollens, Darren A. Craig, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant Joseph J. Reiswerg.
Michael E. Brown, Eric D. Johnson, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant Cohen Garelick & Glazier.
Todd J. Kaiser, John K. Henning, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.
On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Jarboe v. Landmark Community Newspapers of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Moll v. South Central Solar Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Malcolm Simmons and Doris Simmons v. Teresa D. Fenton and James L. GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Criss v. BitzegaioIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Kovach v. Caligor MidwestIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.