Legal Opinion

State v. Gonzales, 5-06-43 (6-25-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 2007No. 5-06-43PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Joseph J. Gonzales, Jr., appeals the judgment of the Hancock County Court of Common Pleas sentencing him to an aggregate term of thirty-four years in prison. On appeal, Gonzales argues that the trial court erred in imposing a sentence in violation of the due process and ex post facto clauses of the United States Constitution; that the trial court did not have authority to impose consecutive sentences; and, that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. Finding that Gonzales' sentence did not violate the due process and ex post facto clauses; that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RigsbeeOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. Jordan, 07-Ap-52 (9-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. Miller, 2-07-02 (9-17-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. Aguilar, 4-07-15 (11-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. Bauer, 8-08-21 (2-2-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API