Kenney v. Medlin Construction & Realty Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
At trial, plaintiff was allowed to give her opinion as to the reasonable fair market value of the house on the date of purchase. Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in admitting this testimony since it affirmatively appeared that plaintiff did not know the fair market value. We find no error.
Generally, the owner is considered competent to testify to the fair market value of his property, even if his knowledge would not qualify him as a witness were he not the owner. The only recognized exception to the general rule is when it affirmatively appears that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Hartley v. BallouSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Robbins v. C. W. Myers Trading Post, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. HeldermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lempke v. DagenaisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Bradley Woodcraft, Inc. v. BoddenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Lapierre v. Samco Development Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Town of Pine Knoll Shores v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Andrulis v. Levin Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.