Legal Opinion
In Re Tumen
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 7, 1944No. 3735aPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, District Judge.
This is a petition of an objecting creditor to review a referee’s order dismissing specifications of objection to a bankrupt’s discharge and granting the discharge.
Fourteen specifications of objection were filed by Nathan Mesnikoff, the sole creditor of the bankrupt, as follows:
“1. Bankrupt has failed to file an accurate inventory of all .of her property both real and personal, and has failed to include therein all statements concerning said property as is required by the provisions of the Bankrupt Act.
“2. Bankrupt has destroyed, mutilated, falsified, concealed and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re RuhlmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- In re WoodDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1922
- In re ServisDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1905
- In re McLaughlinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chaudhry v. Ksenzowski (In Re Ksenzowski)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- In Re LeachDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1960
- Scovell v. Kunec (In Re Kunec)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- In re De CillisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
- In re BeamDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.