Langbord v. United States Department of the Treasury
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentSloviter, Circuit Judge
The members of this panel agree on certain basic issues: The Government of the United States (hereafter “Government”) acted unconstitutionally when it seized the ten Golden Eagle coins that had been delivered to it on behalf of the Langbords for authentication and determined to retain those coins without proceeding to a hearing after the seizure.1 .And I agree with the District Court and the majority that the seizure took place when the Government sent its notice that it would not return the coins.
I also agree with the majority’s view-that the Government in this case rather casually treated…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Brock v. Pierce CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.