Legal Opinion

The People v. Bishop

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1934No. 22688. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farthing

Plaintiff in error, Arthur Bishop, (hereinafter called the defendant,) was charged under section 13 of the Criminal Code, (Smith’s Stat.. 1933, p. 1006; Cahill’s Stat. 1933, p. 990;) with setting fire to, burning and causing to be burned on February 7, 1933, a building located at 2431 Sixth avenue, in the city of Moline. Four counts of the indictment alleged the building to be a house, the property of Arthur Bishop and Myrtle Bishop, four alleged the building to be a dwelling house, the property of Arthur Bishop and Myrtle Bishop, four alleged the building to be, a house, the property of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The People v. FoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  3. The People v. RenoIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  4. The People v. BrewerIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  5. The People v. FarrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. BerlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. The PEOPLE v. NorcuttIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. HolmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. The People v. ArdeleanIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  5. The People v. PatlakIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API