Legal Opinion
Main Seneca Corp. v. Town of Amherst Industrial Development Agency
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 10, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*249OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
The issue before this Court is whether the Town of Amherst Industrial Development Agency (AIDA) and Uniland Partnership violated General Municipal Law § 862 (1) by virtue of moving the accounting firm BDO Seidman, LLP (BDO) from the City of Buffalo to the Town of Amherst. We conclude that section 862 (1) was violated and we affirm the order of the Appellate Division both as to the violation and as to the remedy it imposed.
Enacted in 1969, article 18-A of the General Municipal Law authorizes the Legislature to create industrial development agencies with the purpose…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Village of Canajoharie v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Marine Buffalo Associates, L.P. v. Town of Amherst Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Main Seneca Corp. v. Erie County Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Mohawk Group, L.P. v. Town of Amherst Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- American Rock Salt Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.