In re the Marriage of Rockwell
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.
¶1 Peter Rockwell appeals the division of marital property, arguing it is not just and equitable. The parties argued below that the trial court was mandated by our earlier opinion to follow one of two choices on remand; it was not. We cannot ascertain from the record whether the trial court exercised its discretion or felt constrained to choose between the two positions argued. We vacate the judgment and remand.
FACTS
¶2 Peter and Carmen Rockwell were married from 1978 until 2004, a total of 26 years. In re Marriage of Rockwell, 141 Wn. App. 235, 239, 170 P.3d 572 (2007), review denied, 163…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re the Marriage of RockwellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Jones v. BestWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Jones v. BestWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re the Marriage of KraftWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. SchwabWashington Supreme Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bank of America, NA v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- In Re Marriage of RockwellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Bank Of America v. Kenneth TreigerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- In Re The Custody Of: Brooklyn Helland Heather Helland, Res. And David Isaacson, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In re the Marriage of RockwellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.