State v. Rittman

¶ 1. Roy Lee Rittman appeals the judgment entered after the trial court found him guilty in a bench trial of robbery where the victim reasonably believed that the robber was armed with a dangerous weapon. See Wis. Stat. § 943.32(1) & (2). Rittman contends that there was not enough evidence to support the finding of guilt because he did not: (1) display either a dangerous weapon or anything that could be perceived as a dangerous weapon, or (2) say that he had one. We disagree and affirm.

I

¶ 2. As material to this appeal, Rittman does not dispute the testimony of the bank teller whom he robbed.…