Legal Opinion

Crompton v. Seaich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 24, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, William H. Seaich, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk- of the county of New York on the 9th day of June, 1910, denying the defendant’s motion for judgment on two counterclaims.

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, J.:

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for judgment under section 515 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff sued for $30,000, claimed to be the value of certain stock which, as it was alleged, defendant had agreed to deliver to plaintiff. The answer included a defense to the plaintiff’s cause of action and two counterclaims, one upon a promissory note and one for money loaned, the two together aggregating $4,868.46. No reply was served to either of these counterclaims and the defendant thereupon became entitled to move for judgment thereon. (Code Civ. Proc. §…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crompton v. SeaichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walter v. CarrollNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Crompton v. SeaichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Stratton v. GrahamNew York Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API