Legal Opinion

United Shoe Repairing Machine Co. v. Ferrara

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 1927No. 9405Published

1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.

Plaintiff, claiming to be the owner of certain shoe repairing machinery, sequestered it in the ■ hands of defendants. Lucille L. Ferrara intervened and set up title to the machinery by purchase from John L. Costa, to whom the machinery was adjudicated at a sheriff’s sale in the matter of John P. Viviani vs. Antonio Adiego, No. 148,851 of the Civil District Court. The defendants set up no title to the property. The controversy lies between plaintiff and intervenor. -

Plaintiffs attack the sheriff’s sale to ■ Costa, intervenor’s vendor, upon the ground, first, that it was preceded by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Borron v. SollibellosSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1876
  2. Johnson v. TacneauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API