Legal Opinion
People v. J.F.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 13, 1969No. Crim. No. 13349PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKaus, P. J.
When a minor who is subject to the control of the Youth Authority nears his 21st birthday, the time he would normally be discharged (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 1769), the Youth Authority Board may apply to the committing court for an order directing that he remain subject to its control after he has reached the age of majority. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 1800.) If the court finds “that discharge of the person would be physically dangerous to the public because of his mental or physical deficiency, disorder, or abnormality,” it must make an order that the Youth Authority “continue the treatment.”…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Grier v. T.R.S.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. FiskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re Baby Boy T.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Nino v. Steven F.California Court of Appeal · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.