Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hummel v. ASTRAZENECA LP

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 9, 2008No. 07 Civ. 5473PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Holly Hummel (“Hummel”) brought this action against defendant As-traZeneca LP (“AstraZeneca”), her former employer, alleging that AstraZeneca improperly classified her as exempt from overtime requirements and spread-of-hours compensation, in violation of N.Y. Lab. Law §§ 650 et seq., 190 et seq., and 12 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 142 (collectively, “Hum-mel’s Claims”). AstraZeneca moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (“Rule 56”). For the reasons discussed below, AstraZ-eneca’s motion is GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND 1

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. Alphonso Samuels v. J. Mockry, G. Hewston, W. Higgins and J. DowdleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Shklovskiy v. KhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Skluth v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MM ARIZONA HOLDINGS LLC v. BonannoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  2. Centric Brands Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  3. Jose v. Stoler of Westbury, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2021
  4. LaFlam v. American Sugar Refining, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  5. Lee v. New Kang Suh Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API