Legal Opinion
Raentsch v. American Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 23, 1936No. 8127PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
On September 2, 1935, appellant, alleging that he was a farmer, filed an application under section 75(c), (n), (r) of the *771Bankruptcy Act as amended August 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 246, 942 (11 U.S.C.A. § 203 (c), (n), (r). He did not ask to be adjudged bankrupt under subdivision (s) of section 75 (49 Stat. 942, § 6, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203 (s).
On September 10th, after due notice, the appellee, a creditor, moved to dismiss the proceedings on the ground that the debtor was not a farmer within the meaning of section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act. The motion was heard on September 10, 1935,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Meyer v. Kenmore Granville Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hirschfeld v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Wilkerson v. CoochCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Vitagraph, Inc. v. St. Louis Properties CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hey v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Noble v. Hopewell Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938