McGill v. Holman
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
It is a general rule of law that the owner of personal property may take possession of it wherever he finds it, provided he commits no trespass or breach of the peace and uses no force or threats in its recovery or recaption. Folmar v. Copeland, 57 Ala. 588; Stowers Furniture Co. v. Brake, 158 Ala. 639, 646, 48 South. 89; Brown v. Floyd, 163 Ala. 317, 50 South. 995; Milner v. Milner, 101 Ala. 599, 14 South. 373.
But the authorities are practically unanimous in holding that, where a chattel is placed or left, by the volition or fault of its owner, on the land'of another, without the consent of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis & Son v. HurtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Stowers Furniture Co. v. BrakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Conner & Johnson v. Allen & ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Folmar & Sons v. Copeland & BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Mt. Vernon Lumber Co. v. ShepardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lowery v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Russell-Vaughn Ford, Inc. v. RouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Webb v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Ford Motor Credit Company v. DittonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Speigle v. Chrysler Credit CorporationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.