Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Asphalt Contractors Inc. v. Alabama Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 6, 2013No. 1101439Published

1ConcurrenceBolin, Justice

I concur with the main opinion that Asphalt Contractors, Inc. (“ACI”), stated a valid inverse-condemnation claim against the Alabama Department of Transportation (“ALDOT”) based on its allegations, among others, that ALDOT appropriated ACI’s property for public use; that AL-DOT, through John R. Cooper, its director, physically pumped chemically tainted water onto ACI’s property; and that ALDOT did all of these things without initiating eminent-domain proceedings. As stated below, however, my concurrence is based on a different rationale than that of the main opinion; therefore, I concur in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foreman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Willis v. University of North AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Town of Gurley v. M & N Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API