Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Union Dime Savings Institution

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by an administrator to recover from a savings bank a deposit of his decedent.

1Opinion of the CourtClarke, J.

Action by an administrator to recover the

amount of a deposit of his decedent from the savings bank. Tried by the court without a jury. On the 4th of April, 1900, Julia Huf opened a deposit account with the defendant and as evidence thereof received a bank book No. 354,443, in which were printed certain of the by-laws of the bank. She signed her name in the signature book of the bank and also signed an identification card. The signature book which she signed contained the by-laws of defendant then in force. On the 19th of July, 1900, there was filed with defendant *518a duly executed power of"…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mahon v. South Brooklyn Savings InstitutionNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Podmore v. South Brooklyn Savings InstitutionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Farmer v. Manhattan Savings InstitutionNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Hoffmann v. Union Dime Savings InstitutionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API