Rosalie Sauls v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOB BEHEABING.
HAWKINS, Judge.
In the motion for rehearing appellant attacks the validity of the indictment. It is averred in substance that appellant had possession of an automobile belonging to a named corporation by virtue of a contract of hiring with said corporation, and that without consent of the corporation appellant fraudulently converted said automobile to appellant’sown use, etc. The attack made on the indictment is that a corporation could only act through its officers or employees, and that the indictment should have alleged the name of the officer or employee without…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Osborne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Modica v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Deblanc v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
- Kitchen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.