Legal Opinion

In re the Trust under Agreement with Rubin

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 7, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Eve Preminger, S.

These are two independent applications, decided together, concerning inter vivos trusts for beneficiaries with long-term disabilities. All of the trusts involved were created before supplemental needs trusts were specifically authorized either by case law or by statute. In each of the proceedings, petitioners ask for reformation to conform the instruments’ terms to the statutory requirements for supplemental needs trusts, in order to establish or maintain eligibility of the respective beneficiaries for government benefits necessary for their care.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of PulitzerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  2. In re the Estate of EscherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978
  3. In re GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. In re the Estate of ChoateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1988
  5. In re the Estate of StalpNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of KampNew York Surrogate's Court · 2005
  2. In re the Estate of SmathersNew York Surrogate's Court · 2008
  3. In re RappaportNew York Surrogate's Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API