Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Randolph State Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1934No. 4-3284Published

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts).„The learned chancellor held that, under the ruling of this court in the case of Taylor v. Hale, 186 Ark. 873, 56 S. W. (2d) 428, this was an attempt to collect taxes on shares of stock as provided by § 9944, Crawford & Moses’ Digest; but, in the absence of a showing that the Commissioner in charge of the insolvent bank had assets in his hands belonging to the stockholders with which to pay delinquent taxes assessed against such shares of stock, there was no liability on the part of the Commissioner to pay the. delinquent taxes.

The chancellor obviously…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. HaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API