Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Rhett

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided January 9, 2018No. 2016–CA–01532–COAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEE, C.J., FOR THE COURT:

¶ 1. In this appeal, we must decide whether Samuel and Kathy Johnson's claims against Wythe Rhett were time-barred by the statute of limitations and, as a result, whether summary judgment in favor of Rhett was proper. Because we find the statute-of-limitations issue dispositive, we decline to address the Johnsons' other assignments of error. The case on appeal (Rhett II ) is based largely upon facts and procedural history that occurred in previous litigation between the parties (Rhett I ).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

I. Rhett I

¶ 2. In November 2005, the Johnsons…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. SandersMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  2. City of Mound Bayou v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Price v. ClarkMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Rose v. TullosMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Wilner v. WhiteMississippi Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Curtis Clearman v. Pipestone Property Services, LLC and Mississippi Commercial Landscaping, LLCCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2023
  2. GEICO Casualty Company, Geico General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity a/k/a GEICO Direct, as Subrogee of Fonda Magee v. Bennie StapletonMississippi Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Guerdan v. Community Bank of MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025
  4. Kenneth Coleman v. Stan King Chevrolet, Inc., Dan McKinley and Jessie BowmanCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API