Daoang v. Department of Education
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
RICHARDSON, C.J.
The issue presented on this appeal is whether HRS § 78-3 (1976) 1 which mandates the retirement of all public employees at age 70 violates the equal protection and due process clauses of the Hawaii Constitution, article I, section 4 (as amended and renumbered article I, section 5 (1978).). The trial court affirmed the constitutionality of section 78-3, granting defendant-appellee’s motion for summary judgment. For reasons which are set forth in this opinion, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Gelacio N. Daoang (hereinafter…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Richardson v. Sport Shinko (Waikiki Corp.)Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Sasso v. Ram Property ManagementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Housing Finance & Development Corp. v. CastleHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Kaneohe Bay Cruises, Inc. v. HirataHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- Applications of Herrick and IrishHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.