Daniels v. Kansas Highway Patrol
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion o£ the court was delivered by
Price, C. J.:
This was an action by parents to recover for the wrongful death of their son (K. S. A. 60-1901).
The narrow question presented is whether the doctrine of immunity from tort liability — heretofore extended to agencies of the state and to municipalities when engaged in governmental functions — is to be abolished.
The trial court adhered to the long established rule of immunity.
Plaintiffs have appealed.
We affirm the judgment.
Highly summarized — the petition alleged this tragic sequence of events.
Plaintiffs’ son, Thomas E. Daniels, a University…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carroll v. KittleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Woods v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Parker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Gardner v. McDowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Wommack v. LeshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Sanders v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Mt. Carmel Medical Center v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
- Allen v. City of OgdenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.