Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 1922No. 6698Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

—The conviction is for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor.

The indictment fails to allege that the liquor was possessed for the purpose of sale.

The law, as amended by the Acts of the 37th Leg., 1st Called Session, Chap. 61, requires that the ease be reversed and remanded. The prosecution cannot be maintained upon the preseint indictment. See Francis v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 67, 235 S. W. Rep., 580, and Ex parte Mitchum, 91 Texas Crim. Rep., 62, 237 S. W. Rep., 935, not yet reported.

The judgment is reversed and the! prosecution ordered dismissed.

Reversed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MitchumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Francis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Francis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Ex parte MitchumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API