Legal Opinion

Baker v. Baker

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1939No. 3249Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

For former opinion, see 59 Nev. 163, 87 P. (2d) 800.

R. K. Wittenberg, for Appellant.

William M. Kearney and Robert Taylor Aclams, for Respondent.

OPINION

By the Court,

Taber, C. J.:

In our decision denying respondent’s motion - to dismiss appeal and granting, in part, appellant’s motion for allowances, 59 Nev. 163, 87 P.(2d) 800, 805, we included the following sentence: “Reasonable time after compliance with said order for allowances will be allowed appellant by the district court for preparing, filing and serving proposed bill of exceptions, and for taking such other steps as may be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Comstock Phoenix Mining Co. v. LazzeriNevada Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API