Legal Opinion
Shushan Bros. v. Ortego
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1964No. 1042PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CULPEPPER, Judge.
This is a suit on a promissory note. Plaintiff is the payee, holder and owner of the note. Defendant is the maker. The district judge held in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
The facts show that plaintiff, Shushan Brothers & Company, Inc., sells various lines of merchandise at wholesale. In November of 1960 they employed defendant as a salesman to sell a certain line of merchandise in South Louisiana. Defendant first went through a training period of about two months at the plaintiff’s place of business in New Orleans, during which period he was paid a salary of $60…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Electrical Supply Co. v. Eugene Freeman, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Landry v. HuberLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Williams v. LigonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- American Furniture Co. v. BishopLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Interstate Electric Co. v. Interstate Electric Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Agnew v. CameronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Rai-Lynne Realty, Inc. v. KernLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976