Legal Opinion
People v. Klinge
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 4, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.
The judgments should be reversed and the information dismissed upon the ground that chapter 23, article 13, section 153, subdivision 2 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of New York referring to the fifth ward of Queens borough is unreasonable, arbitrary, oppressive and discriminatory. (Cf. People v. Cohen, 272 N. Y. 319; People v. Kuc, 272 N. Y. 72; Matter of Mid-State Advertising Corp. v. Bond, 274 N. Y. 82.)
Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.
Judgments reversed, etc.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. KucNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Matter of Mid-State Advertising Corp. v. BondNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- People v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
3Cited by9 opinions
- Good Humor Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Schrager v. City of AlbanyNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- Trio Distributor Corp. v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Barr v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Trio Distributor Corp. v. City of AlbanyNew York Supreme Court · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.