Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Travers v. Freese

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1890No. 13433PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco in favor of respondent in a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, which was instituted to test the right to the office of member of the board of pilot commissioners for the ports of San Francisco, Mare Island, and Benicia.

The respondent, Freese, was appointed to said office, by the then governor of the state, in January, 1887, was confirmed by the senate, and, having duly qualified, entered upon the discharge of the duties of the office. Between March 1, 1887, and March 18, 1889, and while the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Travers v. FreeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trimble v. People ex rel. PhelpsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. January v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. People ex rel. Menzies v. GunstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API